What an NMC CBT mock report looks like

This is a worked example, not a real candidate. It shows what you are handed after a full mock: 115 questions sat in one go, 15 of numeracy and 100 clinical, timed and scored as two separate papers over 180 minutes.

Part A: Numeracy

53%

8 of 15 marks, in 30 minutes

Part B: Clinical

75%

75 of 100 marks, in 150 minutes

No pass or fail on either line, and that is deliberate rather than missing. The NMC's pass marks, 13 out of 15 for numeracy and generally 60 to 70 per cent for the clinical paper, are set for its own papers and held steady statistically, and a practice paper is not one of them. What the pass marks are and where they come from.

Part A: Numeracy, by section

SectionRightAsked
Measuring the correct dose12
Metric units22
Oral medications24
Injections13
Intravenous infusions13
Fluid balance11

Part B: Clinical, by section

SectionRightAsked
Platform 1: Being an accountable professional1117
Platform 2: Promoting health and preventing ill health810
Platform 3: Assessing needs and planning care1114
Platform 4: Providing and evaluating care1215
Platform 5: Leading and managing nursing care and working in teams810
Platform 6: Improving safety and quality of care610
Platform 7: Coordinating care810
Annexe A: Communication and relationship management skills57
Annexe B: Nursing procedures67

What this report is telling them

  • The two parts are marked separately, so this is two results rather than one. A strong clinical paper does not carry a weak numeracy one.
  • Within numeracy the loss is concentrated: infusion rates and dosing by weight, not the unit conversions. That is a method to drill rather than a subject to reread.
  • On the clinical paper the weakest categories are the ones about accountability and safety, which candidates most often assume they can reason out from first principles rather than revise.
  • Every question is reviewable afterwards with the explanation beside it, so the report is a reading list rather than a score.

And every question, reviewable

This is one of ours, shown the way the report shows a question you got wrong.

CBT NQ4011

On a vascular surgery ward, a newly qualified staff nurse consistently struggles with aseptic wound dressing technique and surgical drain management. The ward sister collaborates with this team member to identify their specific clinical competence deficits and implement structured, time-bound remedial milestones. Which supportive intervention is being utilised?

Select one answer.

  • Chosen

    Annual appraisal

  • Correct

    Targeted action plan

  •  

    Clinical supervision

  •  

    Post-incident debrief

Why

A targeted action plan establishes explicit, time-limited remedial steps to resolve individual competence deficits. An annual appraisal would instead consist of a routine yearly review of broad continuing professional development and revalidation requirements.

Sit one of your own

A real mock is generated to the blueprint from the question bank, timed as two papers, and scored the same way this one is.